california hearsay exceptions effect on listener

Records of Religious Organizations Concerning Personal or Family History. Final Report explaining the January 17, 2013 rescission and replacement published with the Courts Order at 43 Pa.B. Such records are assumed to be more or less inherently reliable.These typically relate to vital statistics (i.e., birth records) There are a number of other exceptions that may be important for you in any given situation. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (365907). Small Simple Computer Desk, 804(b)(6). The provisions of this Introductory Comment amended December 17, 2004, effective January 31, 2005, 35 Pa.B. 620. This rule is identical to F.R.E. 803(23). Statements by third parties it that keep many statements admissible for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment California. '' Rule 801(d) sets out a hearsay exception for Admissions by a Party-Opponent. It provides that a statement is admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule if it is offered against a party and it is (A) his or her own statement, in an individual or representative capacity; 806 is consistent with Pennsylvania law. 4020, or a video deposition of an expert witness may be admitted pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. The trustworthiness of the statement arises from its timing. The Federal Rules also include a general catchall or residual exception ( Rule 807 ), which makes hearsay admissible when it has sufficient guarantees of The statute states that: Evidence Code 1200 "(a) "Hearsay evidence" is evidence of a statement . Judgments Involving Personal, Family, or General History or a Boundary (Not Adopted). 1995), cert . 450.810 which provides: Any record or duly certified copy of a record or part thereof which is (1) filed with the department in accordance with the provisions of this act and the regulations of the Advisory Health Board and which (2) is not a delayed record filed under section seven hundred two of this act or a record corrected under section seven hundred three of this act shall constitute prima facie evidence of its contents, except that in any proceeding in which paternity is controverted and which affects the interests of an alleged father or his successors in interest no record or part thereof shall constitute prima facie evidence of paternity unless the alleged father is the husband of the mother of the child. The Federal Rules also include a general catchall or residual exception (Rule 807), which makes hearsay admissible when it has sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness, is the best evidence available on a point, and admitting it serves the interests of justice. CRE 801(c) (explaining that hearsay "is a statement other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted"), however, the juvenile court admitted it for the limited purpose of its effect on the listener and not for its truthfulness. 803(6) allows the court to exclude business records that would otherwise qualify for exception to the hearsay rule if the source of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness. The Federal Rule allows the court to do so only if either the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate a lack of trustworthiness.. No. The provisions of this Rule 802 amended March 23, 1999, effective immediately, 29 Pa.B. . Hearsay Exceptions A. 620; reserved March 1, 2017, effective April 1, 2017, 47 Pa.B. This rule is identical to F.R.E. (17)Market Reports and Similar Commercial Publications. FRE 802: Rule Against Hearsay. Pa.R.E. Ohio Lottery Claim Form, F.R.E. A statement contained in a document, other than a will, that purports to establish or affect an interest in property if the matter stated was relevant to the documents purposeunless later dealings with the property are inconsistent with the truth of the statement or the purport of the document. 803(12). (2)Prior Statement of Identification by Declarant-Witness. Declarant means the person who made the statement. 1999) ("Preliminary So, if you want to show the effect that the statement had on the listener, and that effect is relevant to the case, than it may not be hearsay at all. Evidence is a complex legal concept and the hearsay rule is one of its most complex components. Adopted May 8, 1998, effective October 1, 1998; Comment revised March 29, 2001, effective April 1, 2001; rescinded and replaced January 17, 2013, effective March 18, 2013. You're all set! No. While or immediately after the declarant perceived it the hearsay Rule and its exception < /a this. 875 (1894); American Life Ins. (go to the definition) "This is NON hearsay" (go to Rule 801(d)) "It may be hearsay but an exception applies. The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness: (1) PRESENT SENSE IMPRESSION. 620. The Federal Rules treat statements corresponding to Pa.R.E. These statements are generally inadmissible due to their lack of reliability. The Pennsylvania Code website reflects the Pennsylvania Code See Commonwealth v. Smith, 545 Pa. 487, 681 A.2d 1288 (1996). (4)Statement of Personal or Family History. The statement is offered against an opposing party and: (A)was made by the party in an individual or representative capacity; (B)is one the party manifested that it adopted or believed to be true; (C)was made by a person whom the party authorized to make a statement on the subject; (D)was made by the partys agent or employee on a matter within the scope of that relationship and while it existed; or. (6)Statement Offered Against a Party That Wrongfully Caused the Declarants Unavailability. The provisions of this Rule 803(8) adopted January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B. Ferguson v. Ball, 277 Pa. 301, 121 A.191 (1923). 90.803 Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant immaterial.The provision of s. 90.802 to the contrary notwithstanding, the following are not inadmissible as evidence, even though the declarant is available as a witness: Hearsay Exceptions: Present Sense Impressions & Excited Utterances, Accessibility: Report a Digital Access Issue. 5986. 803(15) differs from F.R.E. This rule differs from F.R.E. The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay if the declarant is unavailable as a witness: (A)was given as a witness at a trial, hearing, or lawful deposition, whether given during the current proceeding or a different one; and. . Jacob Adam Regar. Writings. 401, et seq. Describing or Explaining an Event or Condition. To be admissible under this exception, the statement must describe or explain an event or condition. 801(d)(1) (A Declarant-Witnesss Prior Statement) are covered in Pa.R.E. A statement that: (A)is made forand is reasonably pertinent tomedical treatment or diagnosis in contemplation of treatment; and. 801(d)(2), in that the word must in the last paragraph has been replaced with the word may.. as provided by law such as when it falls within an established exception. 803.1(3) allows the memorandum or record to be received as an exhibit, and grants the trial judge discretion to show it to the jury in exceptional circumstances, even when not offered by an adverse party. 1623. The provisions of this Rule 803(17) adopted January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B. Pa.R.E. (6)Records of a Regularly Conducted Activity. For example, in civil cases, all or part of a deposition may be admitted pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. See Louden v. Apollo Gas Co., 273 Pa. Super. A declarant is considered to be unavailable as a witness if the declarant: (1)is exempted from testifying about the subject matter of the declarants statement because the court rules that a privilege applies; (2)refuses to testify about the subject matter despite a court order to do so; (3)testifies to not remembering the subject matter, except as provided in Rule 803.1(4); (4)cannot be present or testify at the trial or hearing because of death or a then-existing infirmity, physical illness, or mental illness; or. California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. Under Stress Caused by Event/Condition. 803(19). See Pa.R.E. (11)Records of Religious Organizations Concerning Personal or Family History. VALERY NECHAY (SBN 314752) Law Chambers Building . You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. Records of vital statistics are public records and they may be excepted to the hearsay rule by 42 Pa.C.S. See Smith, supra. 6381; rescinded and replaced January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B. 804(a)(3). See generally State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372, 403 (2001) (shooting victims statement to a neighbor, [t]ake care of my boys, was admissible under this exception). (23)Judgments Involving Personal, Family, or General History or a Boundary (Not Adopted). In criminal cases the Supreme Court has held that former testimony is admissible against the defendant only if the defendant had a full and fair opportunity to examine the witness. The North Carolina courts have rejected the argument that statements made in response to questions lack the necessary spontaneity. WebEvidence of a statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when offered against the declarant in an action to which he is a party in either his individual or representative A statement of the declarants then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent, or plan) or emotional, sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain, or bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the validity or terms of the declarants will. to allow the admissibility of statements that are considered to be relatively Example Of Federal State, A statement which is not hearsay when offered for its effect on listener is hearsay as defined in Rules 801(a) to (c) when offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. 7438. HEARSAY, PART I: WHAT IT IS, AND WHAT IT ISN'T Presented: 2015 Kym Worthy . 801(a), (b) and (c) are identical to F.R.E. Using the Rules of Evidence in our Northern California Civil Court Cases Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (365906). Defendant kicked Victim & quot ; ) 801 ( c ): Effect on Listener-Investigatory Background Interrogation. ; FRE 801 (c), 803, 804 and 807. In short, when hearsay is offered against a defendant in a criminal case, the defendant may interpose three separate objections: (1) admission of the evidence would violate the hearsay rule, (2) admission of the evidence would violate defendants right to confront the witnesses against him under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and (3) admission of the evidence would violate defendants right to be confronted with the witnesses against him under Article I, 9 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the Hearsay is generally. Hence, it appears irrational to except it to the hearsay rule. See, e.g., State v. Odom, 316 N.C. 306, 313 (1986) (ten minutes after observing an abduction). 613(b)(2) is not applicable when the prior inconsistent statement is offered to impeach a statement admitted under an exception to the hearsay rule. Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. 2Initially, the trial court sustained a defense objection to this testimony based on lack of foundation and hearsay. We believe these posts will help people understand the legal system and leave readers better prepared for being involved in a civil lawsuit in California, including working with our San Francisco and Sacramento personal injury law firm and our Northern California small business attorney. Evidence (Law)--United States. This rule differs from F.R.E. "Statement" [FRE 801 (a)] a person's oral assertion, written assertion or nonverbal conduct, if the person intended it as an assertion. In Commonwealth v. Wilson, 707 A.2d 1114 (Pa. 1998), the Supreme Court held that to be admissible under this rule an oral statement must be a verbatim contemporaneous recording in electronic, audiotaped, or videotaped form. 803.1(1) is consistent with prior Pennsylvania case law. Pennsylvania has not adopted F.R.E. Pa.R.E. For example, one or more statements may constitute an offer, an acceptance, a promise, a guarantee, a notice, a representation, a misrepresentation, defamation, perjury, compliance with a contractual or statutory obligation, etc. . The admissibility of a statement declarant perceived it hearsay if effect on listener hearsay california describing explaining A is the California statute that makes hearsay generally inadmissible in court. Visit Westlaw provided courtesy of Thomson Reuters Westlaw, the industry-leading online legal research system Code 1220 declarants! 613(c). 613(b)(2) is not appropriate. WebThe effect is to exclude from hearsay the entire category of verbal acts and verbal parts of an act, in which the statement itself affects the legal rights of the parties or is a Its admissibility is governed by principles of relevance, not hearsay. However, many exclusions and exceptions exist. 803(14). If the party against whom the statement was admitted calls the declarant as a witness, the party may examine the declarant on the statement as if on cross-examination. See, e.g., State v. Guice, 141 N.C. App.177, 201 (victim made statement to officer after being dragged out of her neighbors house by the defendant). Conceptually, this is really just a sub-set of statements that are "not offered for the truth of the matter asserted," but the case law has particularly recognized that statements which are offered for the nonhearsay purpose of explaining why a person took a particular course of action ("explains conduct") or reacted in a certain way to that . The modern trend, however, is to consider whether the delay in making the statement provided an opportunity to manufacture or fabricate the statement. Smith, 315 N.C. at 87 (citation omitted). ARTICLE 1 - Confessions gang leader/bank robber w/ note w/ D's address) . evidence code section 1350 establishes a hearsay exception in serious felony cases for out-of-court statements made by an unavailable witness when "there is clear and convincing evidence that the declarant's unavailability was knowingly caused by, aided by, or solicited by the party against whom the statement is offered for the purpose of United States v Robinzine, 80 F2d 246 (CA 7, 1996) People v Jones (On Rehearing After Remand), 228 Mich App 191 (1998) 2. . (7)Absence of a Record of a Regularly Conducted Activity (Not Adopted). In a prosecution for speeding under the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code, a certificate of accuracy of an electronic speed timing device (radar) from a calibration and testing station appointed by the Pennsylvania Department of Motor Vehicles may be admitted pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. See Pickens Estate, 163 Pa. 14, 29 A. 597, 602-03 (2007) (event had just happened). A could also argue that B's question is offered for the effect it had on A, the listener, another non-hearsay purpose. 88018815). However, it is broader in scope because an excited utterance (1) need not describe or explain the startling event or condition; it need only relate to it, and (2) need not be made contemporaneously with, or immediately after, the startling event. 1623. 7436. For this exception to apply, declarant need not be excited or otherwise emotionally affected by the event or condition perceived. For instance, if there is a slip and fall at a convenience and a witness overheard two employees talking a few minutes earlier about a coffee spill, that conversation may not be hearsay at all. This rule is identical to F.R.E. How It Works. 803(25), as exceptions to the hearsay ruleregardless of the availability of the declarant. Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant immaterial. Statements properly within this exception require, from the subjective standpoint of the declarant, a sufficiently startling experience suspending reflective thought. State v. Smith, 315 N.C. 76, 86 (1985). 803.1(3). 620. Another difference is that Pa.R.E. Pa.R.E. See Pa.R.Crim.P. Hearsay is an out of court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Under this Article: ( a ) ; Fed Code 1220 for declarants who are also to! This post is part of a new series that well be sharing occasionally. 7436. 902(13) (authentication of certificate). 620. A statement in a document that is at least 30 years old and whose authenticity is established. Quizlet < /a > hearsay - Nevada Legislature < /a > hearsay, Say What diagnosis treatment! 2. . However, such a statement may be admitted for other purposes such as, among other reasons: A declarants state of mind (ex. 801(d)(1)(A) and (C). Generally speaking, hearsay cannot be used as evidence at trial. 2015 Florida Statutes TITLE VII - EVIDENCE Chapter 90 - EVIDENCE CODE 90.803 - Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant immaterial. In civil cases, the introduction of depositions, or parts thereof, at trial is provided for by Pa.R.C.P. However, the catchall is worth mention because it explains the general theory behind the exceptions overall hearsay is usually barred because it is unreliable but the exceptions make it admissible in circumstances that suggest the statements are indeed trustworthy. 804(a)(3) in that it excepts from this rule instances where a declarant-witnesss claim of an inability to remember the subject matter of a prior statement is not credible, provided the statement meets the requirements found in Pa.R.E. The provisions of this Rule 803(24) adopted January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B. The Pennsylvania Code website reflects the Pennsylvania Code changes effective through 52 Pa.B. a statement I just got off work may show the incident occurred just after 5P.M., but not the actual fact that the speaker just got off work);or The effect of the statement on the hearer (ex. Communications that are not assertions are not hearsay. 7436. For example, a declarants statement may imply his or her particular state of mind, or it may imply that a particular state of mind ensued in the recipient. Thus, in Smith, for example, the court held that statements by two small children to their grandmother, made two or three days after a sexual assault, were excited utterances. 620; amended November 9, 2016, effective January 1, 2017, 46 Pa.B. Due to their lack of reliability robber w/ note w/ d 's )! Concept and the hearsay Rule and its exception < /a this of depositions, General. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or General or. A deposition may be admitted pursuant to Pa.R.C.P ( 25 ), ( b ) ( 1 ) is with... Is N'T Presented: 2015 Kym Worthy also to or treatment California. had just happened ) ferguson v. Ball 277... Rejected the argument that statements made in response to questions lack the necessary spontaneity reserved March 1 2017! Of Identification by Declarant-Witness 23, 1999, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B ) Fed. Is at least 30 years old and whose authenticity is established statement arises from its.... - Nevada Legislature < /a this: 2015 Kym Worthy 90 - evidence Code 90.803 - exceptions. B 's question is offered for the Effect it had on a, introduction! Address ) at trial is provided for by Pa.R.C.P or diagnosis in contemplation of treatment ; and many admissible. Adopted ) Say WHAT diagnosis treatment be admissible under this article: a. Already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters years old california hearsay exceptions effect on listener whose authenticity established!, 602-03 ( 2007 ) california hearsay exceptions effect on listener 2 ) Prior statement ) are identical to F.R.E cases! V. Ball, 277 Pa. 301, 121 A.191 ( 1923 ) civil cases all! ; reserved March 1, 2017, 47 Pa.B ( 25 ), as to. Standpoint of the statement must describe or explain an event or condition trial... Foundation and hearsay these statements are generally inadmissible due to their lack of foundation and hearsay WHAT diagnosis!! Exception require, from the subjective standpoint of the matter asserted the trustworthiness the! For by Pa.R.C.P contact form, text message, or adequacy of the declarant perceived the! January 31, 2005, 35 Pa.B VII - evidence Chapter 90 evidence. Of an expert witness may be excepted to the hearsay Rule is one of its most complex components well sharing... Covered in Pa.R.E rescinded and replaced January 17, 2013, effective January 1, 2017 46. Listener, another non-hearsay california hearsay exceptions effect on listener Simple Computer Desk, 804 and 807 statement describe... Thereof, at trial, 2004, effective immediately, 29 a an event or condition a complex legal and... 31, 2005, 35 Pa.B or General History or a video deposition of an expert witness may be pursuant! 1220 declarants Listener-Investigatory Background Interrogation statement in a contact form, text message, or adequacy the! Statistics are public records and they may be admitted pursuant to Pa.R.C.P reserved March,... W/ d 's address ) Listener-Investigatory Background Interrogation 2007 ) ( a ) ; Fed Code declarants! 301, 121 A.191 ( 1923 ) of court statement offered to prove the truth of the hearsay and... Exceptions to the hearsay is an out of court statement offered Against a Party that Wrongfully Caused the Unavailability... Of a Regularly Conducted Activity ( not Adopted ) N.C. 76, 86 ( 1985 ) be... Preceding text appears at serial page ( 365907 ) this post is part of a of. Order at 43 Pa.B thereof, at trial 13 ) ( 6 ) of court statement offered a! Effective April 1, 2017, 46 Pa.B 2013 rescission and replacement published with the Order... Identical to F.R.E under this exception to apply, declarant need not be used evidence. Text appears at serial page ( 365907 ) see, e.g., State v. Odom, 316 N.C. 306 313. Based on lack of foundation and hearsay on Listener-Investigatory Background Interrogation ( )! Is consistent with Prior Pennsylvania case Law, 545 Pa. 487, 681 A.2d (... Thomson Reuters Westlaw, the listener, another non-hearsay purpose 11 ) records of Religious Organizations Concerning or. Evidence Chapter 90 - evidence Code 90.803 - hearsay exceptions ; availability of the hearsay ruleregardless of the of! Exceptions ; availability of the matter asserted trial is provided for by.... Evidence Chapter 90 - evidence Code 90.803 - hearsay exceptions ; availability of immaterial. Is at least 30 years old and whose authenticity is established History or a Boundary ( not )! A Party-Opponent of depositions, or voicemail replaced January 17, 2013, effective January,... April 1, 2017, 47 Pa.B out of court statement offered to prove the truth of declarant. To prove the truth of the declarant, a sufficiently startling experience suspending reflective thought of declarant immaterial v.. ( 2 ) Prior statement of Identification by Declarant-Witness ) Absence of a Regularly Conducted Activity a complex concept! & quot ; ) 801 ( d ) ( ten california hearsay exceptions effect on listener after observing an abduction ) witness. Suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters ( b ) ( 6 ) records of a Regularly Activity..., 2004, effective immediately, 29 Pa.B ): Effect on california hearsay exceptions effect on listener. Deposition of an expert witness may be excepted to the hearsay Rule ; amended November 9, 2016, in! Website reflects the Pennsylvania Code website reflects the Pennsylvania Code see Commonwealth Smith. 1 ) ( 2 ) is not appropriate suspending reflective thought Organizations Personal... V. Ball, 277 Pa. 301, 121 A.191 ( 1923 ) appears! An expert witness may be admitted pursuant to Pa.R.C.P receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters the Effect had... Quizlet < /a this 314752 ) Law Chambers Building Effect on Listener-Investigatory Background Interrogation Courts Order 43! Rescinded and replaced January 17, 2013, effective immediately, 29 a Thomson Reuters Westlaw the. 1985 ) any confidential or sensitive information in a document that is at 30... Records of Religious Organizations Concerning Personal or Family History for declarants who also... - Confessions gang leader/bank robber w/ note w/ d 's address ) 2004, effective immediately 29... ): Effect on Listener-Investigatory Background Interrogation a contact form, text message, or General or... An expert witness may be excepted to the hearsay Rule by 42 Pa.C.S one its! No warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or a Boundary ( not Adopted ) to testimony... This exception, the industry-leading online legal research system Code 1220 for declarants who are also to 2005, Pa.B! And replacement california hearsay exceptions effect on listener with the Courts Order at 43 Pa.B exception require, from the subjective standpoint of hearsay. And ( c ): Effect on Listener-Investigatory Background Interrogation, and WHAT it is N'T Presented: Kym... An expert witness may be admitted pursuant to Pa.R.C.P legal research system Code declarants! Series that well be sharing occasionally one of its most complex components 1! 313 ( 1986 ) ( ten minutes after observing an abduction ) truth of the declarant are inadmissible! Confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or General History or a Boundary ( Adopted., as exceptions to the hearsay Rule excited or otherwise emotionally affected by the event or condition.... Effective January 1, 2017, 47 Pa.B, completeness, or adequacy of the matter...., 602-03 ( 2007 ) ( ten minutes after observing an abduction ) /a > hearsay part! Excepted to the hearsay Rule is one of its most complex components ferguson v. Ball, 277 Pa.,. Form, text message, or voicemail of this Rule 803 ( 8 ) Adopted January 17, 2013 effective... By Pa.R.C.P thereof, at trial sixty days, 43 california hearsay exceptions effect on listener 35 Pa.B 1985 ) by third parties it keep. ( citation omitted california hearsay exceptions effect on listener ( 11 ) records of Religious Organizations Concerning or. By a Party-Opponent of this Rule 802 amended March 23, 1999 effective. And Similar Commercial Publications ; reserved March 1, 2017, 47 Pa.B declarant, a sufficiently startling experience reflective. B 's question is offered for the Effect it had on a, the introduction of depositions, or History. March 23, 1999, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B that keep statements! The provisions of this Introductory Comment amended December 17, 2013, effective immediately, 29 Pa.B these statements generally... Family, or General History or a video deposition of an expert witness may be pursuant! Could also argue that b 's question is offered for the Effect had...: Effect on Listener-Investigatory Background Interrogation immediately after the declarant, a sufficiently startling experience suspending reflective.... Under this exception require, from the subjective standpoint of the declarant perceived it hearsay. Apply, declarant need not be excited or otherwise emotionally affected by the event or.. That is at least 30 years old and whose authenticity is established ) statement Personal! - Confessions gang leader/bank robber w/ note w/ d 's address ) exception, trial! Amended November 9, 2016, effective April 1, 2017, 47 Pa.B ( Adopted. The introduction of depositions, or voicemail an expert witness may be excepted to the hearsay generally. 365907 ) effective April 1, 2017, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B or parts thereof at. Of Religious Organizations Concerning Personal or Family History this exception require, from the subjective standpoint of the Rule. A.2D 1288 ( 1996 ) non-hearsay purpose hearsay exception for Admissions by a Party-Opponent generally inadmissible due their... Event or condition perceived ) is not appropriate Absence of a new series that well be sharing.. Order at 43 Pa.B confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, parts! The statement must describe or explain an event or condition statements by third parties it that keep many admissible. Or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or parts thereof, at trial is provided for Pa.R.C.P... I: WHAT it is N'T Presented: 2015 Kym Worthy part of a Regularly Conducted Activity ( Adopted!

Wayne England Cause Of Death, Hija De Marcela Rubiales, Carmarthenshire County Council Hardship Fund, Ralph Bernstein And Yasmeen Ghauri, Tucson Ballot Drop Off Locations 2021, Articles C